CGI TV
Getty images
Not everything you saw on TV during the Olympic opening ceremonies actually happened . . . and I'm not talking about the guy 'flying' to light the torch. Apparently it has been revealed that there was extensive use of 'live' CGI to enhance the fireworks display. (read report here) (update: see original SkyNews report here)
Now Chris Chase at Yahoo Sports says "The Opening Ceremony is, at its core, just one big performance. And isn't it accepted that some things might not be legit at a performance? The final torch bearer wasn't actually running around the top of the stadium, does the fact that everyone could figure that out make it any less impressive? It might have been unnecessarily deceptive, but the firework-faking isn't really that big of a deal."
Is that really the case? Is the deception of billions of people not that big of a deal? It may not be --and there in lies the rub.
My first inclination is to say that there really is no comparison between the gravity defying man and the fireworks. We know that the man flying is performance because it breaks the laws of everyday existence and is presented as such . . .
but the 'coverage' of the fireworks display is more in the genre of 'photo journalism'. It is televised reporting of an event . . . television is supposed to allow millions (billions!) of people to participate --as though they were there-- in a geographically and temporally localized event.
In fact, however, we never experience those events . . . we constantly go beyond the event.
We enter the world of hyperreality.
The point that Chris Chase of Yahoo Sports is attempting to make (in a flippant throw away manner) is that situation, audience expectation and 'genre' will dictate the limits of 'reality manipulation' via television. The opening ceremony of the Olympics is in the same genre as David Copperfield making the Statue of Liberty disappear or David Blane levitating whereas the coverage of the war in Iraq and the Democratic/Republican National Convention are in a more authentic genre or television journalism.
Indeed, this is not the case! The DNCC has already hired 'seasoned production and design teams' to produce the convention for television. (see the report here) Is this not in the genre of performance? This is 'reality tv' and its actors have been writing the book for the new New York Reality TV School for decades now. (see the Nightline report here)
But certainly this osmotic membrane that is television has no effect of how we live in the everyday world!?
I remember how utterly 'fake' the Lunar Earthrise seemed to me when the footage came back from the Japanese Kaguya satellite. (see the Earthrise here) Does it really matter that we see what they said we are seeing? It looks like a movie or a video game. Kaguya's hi-def cameras captured what Baudrillard calls 'The Pornography of the Real' . . . Like the porno --which grants us a view of something that we would never see but wish it would look like in an attempt to remind us of what we think we experienced or never had but always wanted to-- maybe all that matters is that television shows us what we think something should look like.
This the genre of performance has such a power over our lives it even has had an effect on the U.S. torture policy. (see Newsweek report here)
Dahlia Lithwick says, "According to British lawyer and writer Sands, Jack Bauer—played by Kiefer Sutherland—was an inspiration at early "brainstorming meetings" of military officials at Guantánamo in September 2002. Diane Beaver, the staff judge advocate general who gave legal approval to 18 controversial interrogation techniques including waterboarding, sexual humiliation and terrorizing prisoners with dogs, told Sands that Bauer "gave people lots of ideas." Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security chief, gushed in a panel discussion on "24" organized by the Heritage Foundation that the show"reflects real life."
what is going on here?
So, in hyperreality, not only are we constantly going beyond the event . . . but in our attempts to capture 'reality' the event is slowly becoming our 'reality'. More importantly and precisely, media is affecting our bodies and the way we move through our world and daily concerns.
The tangled webs we weave . . .
what will we do?
***
Update:
MSNBC has a new report about the CGI fireworks citing British Sky News (source)
"Even those at the city’s new Bird’s Nest National Stadium, where the Olympics are being held, viewed the fake footage from their seats as they watched on the stadium’s giant television screens, said Britain’s Sky News, in a story, “Olympic Fireworks Faked for TV.”
“Stunned viewers thought they were watching the string of fireworks filmed from above by a helicopter,” said SkyNews.com. “ But in reality they were watching a 3-D graphics sequence that took almost a year to produce.”





Recent Comments